The I had my epiphany....
There was an article on REST on InfoQ that got me thinking about it once more. The article had a link to an application written in the REST style. The application allowed you to make telephone calls by sending messages using REST. It suddenly clicked. A RESTful request is a message send in an OO sense. OO is all about sending messages, it is the reciever that then interprets the message and selects an associated process depending on the message REPRESENTATION. For human consumption the message normally contains verbs, but as far as the recviever is concerned, the message is just a label (noun) which is used to select a process defined up front.
OO isn't about verbs, its about messages (nouns) which recievers act upon. So REST is kind of like a dynamic OO message send. An Example:
Buying a book at Amazon.
I would need to GET the book details and price info from Amazon, and
determine that indeed this is the book I want and that I like the price.
I would then POST my credit card details and delivery address, along with
any other relevant details back to Amazon..
As long as Amazon and I agree on the REPRESENTATION of these messages then
everything should all work fine.
Know using a keyword message format like in smalltalk I could send to Amazon the message:
As Mark Baker points out. A message in distributed programming is normally "a document with an operation and address wrapped around it". REST isn't like that. The operation is implicit in the URL and the REPRESENTATION of the document. So the same "message" in REST is:
Response: A document with the book details an price.
And I would post back my credit card details:
Response: A document showing the success or failure of the transaction.
So you can send any message you like with REST, by transfering documents. It is that simple. So why didn't I get it before?